Dear colleagues,
The last question from the conference in Reykjavik:
Group no. 7
Is there something like “library pedagogy”? Are we properly prepared for the role as
pedagogues?
"Yes, of course, “library pedagogy” exists and we are pedagogues
whether we like it or not. A problem is that many librarians are not sufficiently trained for the
role. We simply don’t have time to enter the role as pedagogues, as we are usually
overwhelmed with other library tasks. In most libraries we also need more librarians to be
able to cope with this pedagogy role.
The library at the Department of music and media in Piteå belongs to Luleå University library,
where LRC, Learning Resource Center, is growing stronger and stronger. LRC is an
organization unit for the University’s researchers, teachers and students. LRC offers
pedagogical service and support for the learning process in all kind of ways.
The library has also the responsibility for all publications at the university."
Elisabeth Hansson, Musikhögskolan i Malmö
Yvonne Suopanki-Lakso, Musikhögskolan i Piteå
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Friday, April 3, 2009
Library anxiety
Dear colleagues,
There are now only two questions left from the conference in Reykjavik. Group no 6 dealt with the following: How do we deal with “library anxiety” – a term often used to describe the feeling of inferiority among library users?
Please, share your experiences with your colleagues!
~Pia~
There are now only two questions left from the conference in Reykjavik. Group no 6 dealt with the following: How do we deal with “library anxiety” – a term often used to describe the feeling of inferiority among library users?
Please, share your experiences with your colleagues!
~Pia~
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Progression in information literacy education for music students
Dear colleagues,
I now post question number 5 from the conference in Reykjavik about Bologna related topics.
Group no. 5
The Bologna agreement talks about progression. How do we apply a progressive approach
to information literacy education for our music students?
Our group started the discussion by defining the term “progression” as “kunskapsutveckling”
(development of knowledge). We had an idea that it might be easier to measure progression
in other subject fields than music.
According to the Bologna agreement progression should take place between the three levels
Bachelor, Master and Doctorate as well as within each level. Johan Söderberg,
Musikhögskolan Piteå, the only person in our group, who had experience of “formalized”
teaching meant that the needs of the students at bachelor and master level do not differ.
Therefore his library offers information literacy education only to the bachelor students. The
education includes an introduction to the library catalogue, the library homepage, evaluation
of sources etc. The teaching has the individual degree projects as the reference point. The
library staff meets the students again at the doctoral level. The teaching now focuses on
specific databases, handling reference tools (for example Endnote), the publication process
etc.
Another approach to information literacy education is a more personal contact, based on the
students individual needs and interests during different stages in their education. Inger-Mari
Malm from Tromsö shared her positive experiences of inspiring the students to use the
library for finding information. She mentioned a few examples:
• Collecting groups of instrumentalists with their teachers and showing them relevant
resources, sometimes with themes such as early music, folk music and old
recordings.
• Collecting students from the rock/pop/jazz department (“rytmisk linje”) with the
resource “American Memory”, available at the web site of Library of Congress, as the
theme.
• Exhibitions, with bibliographies and listed subject terms, on themes like jazz, female
vocalists, bluegrass etc.
Finally we all agreed that the conditions for information literacy education for our music
students vary a lot. One important factor is of course the size of the school. An institution like
the Sibelius Academy with 1.700 students probably needs to work in a more formal manner
than many other smaller schools. We also agreed that different programmes need different
approaches. Our experience tells us that the needs, interests and attitudes of the persons
studying classical music versus rock/jazz are quite different. We have to take this into
consideration.
Pia Shekhter
I now post question number 5 from the conference in Reykjavik about Bologna related topics.
Group no. 5
The Bologna agreement talks about progression. How do we apply a progressive approach
to information literacy education for our music students?
Our group started the discussion by defining the term “progression” as “kunskapsutveckling”
(development of knowledge). We had an idea that it might be easier to measure progression
in other subject fields than music.
According to the Bologna agreement progression should take place between the three levels
Bachelor, Master and Doctorate as well as within each level. Johan Söderberg,
Musikhögskolan Piteå, the only person in our group, who had experience of “formalized”
teaching meant that the needs of the students at bachelor and master level do not differ.
Therefore his library offers information literacy education only to the bachelor students. The
education includes an introduction to the library catalogue, the library homepage, evaluation
of sources etc. The teaching has the individual degree projects as the reference point. The
library staff meets the students again at the doctoral level. The teaching now focuses on
specific databases, handling reference tools (for example Endnote), the publication process
etc.
Another approach to information literacy education is a more personal contact, based on the
students individual needs and interests during different stages in their education. Inger-Mari
Malm from Tromsö shared her positive experiences of inspiring the students to use the
library for finding information. She mentioned a few examples:
• Collecting groups of instrumentalists with their teachers and showing them relevant
resources, sometimes with themes such as early music, folk music and old
recordings.
• Collecting students from the rock/pop/jazz department (“rytmisk linje”) with the
resource “American Memory”, available at the web site of Library of Congress, as the
theme.
• Exhibitions, with bibliographies and listed subject terms, on themes like jazz, female
vocalists, bluegrass etc.
Finally we all agreed that the conditions for information literacy education for our music
students vary a lot. One important factor is of course the size of the school. An institution like
the Sibelius Academy with 1.700 students probably needs to work in a more formal manner
than many other smaller schools. We also agreed that different programmes need different
approaches. Our experience tells us that the needs, interests and attitudes of the persons
studying classical music versus rock/jazz are quite different. We have to take this into
consideration.
Pia Shekhter
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)